Category: News and Views
{London Reuters}
A DNA test has proved David Blunkett is NOT the father of his ex lovers new son, Baby Lorcan was born caesarian last month to Kimberly Quinn,publisher of Spectator magazine, with whom Blunkett had a 3 year affair starting in 2001.
...............................
.The unnamed spokesman said in a statement "the test was undertaken shortly after the birth."This has established that Mr Blunkett is not the father."
DNA tests are being carried out on the rest of the male population of london to try and detrmine who is the fahter ...
lol! she has no respect for herself that hussy I bet Blunkett's gutted eh..
Well I dunnow about that ... but now see there's one thing puzzles me ... let's imagine wifey comes to you and says .. Darling? I have to tell you something. See I've been unfaithful to you. 3 months after we got married I started seeing someone else, not only that, but I'm pregnant, so there's a chance the baby might not be yours. Well you might forgive her, you might take the child on and bring him up as your own, even though you know that he is not biologically your son. But then two years later wifey comes to you again and says ... Darling? now here's the thing ... remember that guy I was seeing? well I continued to see him and I'm pregnant again ... so chances are, that baby number 2 might not be yours either! Now maybe i am less forgiving than most, but actually I don't think so. I mean you might forgive one affair, but an ongoing one and two kids? does steven quinn have mug tatued on his forehead?
Wifey would be out on her arse the 1st time, I wouldn't hang around to witness the birth of her 2nd B*st*rd..
I very much think he has EEGIT in large red letters,he's either staying for the sake of the children, for financial reasons,or he's just quietly playing the good honest put upon husband in order to win a law suit .
Oh dear me sugarbaby I can't endorse any of that. You know very well that relationships are a subjective thing. To dismiss someone as a mug because he has the forgiving nature to do what you, and most probably I, wouldn't do is not altogether fair. Mr quinn is the only one to emerge from this with any credit, and I must say a great deal of credit in my book. Mrs Quinn's infidelity doesn't earn her any respect in my book, but I hope she'll reconsider her conduct for the future. aS for Mr Blunkett, he emerges with nothing out of this: his maniacal pursuit of Mrs Quinn can't even be justified by 'that little lad' anymore. Badgering solicitors, exercising undue influence on legal professional privilege, making nuisance telephone calls, all these are acts committed by a man supposedly learned in the law and entrusted with high office until recently. You may indeed say that I'm being unfair on Mr Blunkett, and he did of course have the right to have the paternity determined. To that I would answer, perhaps you're right, but there's no denying that he has also behaved with remarkable impropriety, especially when he seconded civil servants to the Offices of simpkins solicitors to coerce Mrs Quinn into signing a statement. At least now that little lad's out of the way he can return to the shadow cabinet after the election.
actually lawlord I must correct you there because that little lad is not out of the way, as mr blunkett is, in fact, the father of Mrs Quinn's first son William. As for the second child, wel reports are that he is Asian, which only creates further questions as to the identity of his father, as I believe the other journalist with whom Kimberley Quinn is believed to have had liaisons is white, so it would seem she is a very free and giving woman.
None of that, however, alters the misdemeanours of Mr Blunkett that I have elucidated above. The little lad who was the subject of the tears may well have been William I grant you, but quite rightly you left unchallenged the material on Simpkins Solicitors, for instance, from whence I take it that you will concede this material to be correct.